"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> 
> This grass may be slow but the code (IMHO) is ingeniously simple!  A
> 320x 240 took 23 min to render...
> 

Interesting idea, but not very flexible though.  Adding improvements to the
isosurface function would probably increase render time a lot.  I wonder how
this compares to a tiled noise heightfield.  It would surely need more memory
but the rendering time could be similar or shorter.  

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message