|
|
A total cheat, mister!
Sure it looks good, but imagemaps are not very flexible, cause they are
not very real... Okay I use them too, but I have found that the greatest
realism is achieved when objects are modelled like in real life.
Well, your clouds are in the horisont, so unless you plan an animation
of them, or a sundown, it doesn't matter if they're real or not. And as
long as you put enough real things into the picture, people will look at
mostly them, and not the clouds... In which case you can receieve praise
with a clean conscience.
- Hugo
Simon wrote:
>> I guess this shows that, on occasion, imagemaps aren't the terrible
>> solution they're made out to be.
Post a reply to this message
|
|