Chris Huff wrote:

> It might even be possible to do this and still support the existing
> language to a degree.

Of course, you're right. My assumption was that implementing OO shouldn't
be so hard that it would require a complete rewrite, but it may still be
true that it's easier to do so, even though it's not required. And just as
you said, even though the parser (and other affected parts) are rewritten
we could still keep the old syntax.

----------------------------------------------------
Mikael Carneholm, B.Sc.
Dep. of Computer Science and Business Administration


Personal homepage:
http://www.studenter.hb.se/~arch
E-mail:
sa9### [at] idautbhbse

Post a reply to this message