POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? : Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? Server Time
2 Sep 2024 06:18:46 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions?  
From: Warp
Date: 4 Aug 2000 05:51:21
Message: <398a9219@news.povray.org>
Peter Popov <pet### [at] usanet> wrote:
: Why am I thinking that this issue has not been standardised yet?

  What do you mean?
  It is clearly stated in the C and C++ standards.

  If you mean that there's no common standard for all programming languages,
that's only good. If in a specific programming language it's a lot more
natural to state that 'false' is -1 (for example for speed reasons), then
there's no reason to force it to be anything else.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.