POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? : Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? Server Time
2 Sep 2024 08:14:24 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions?  
From: Mark Gordon
Date: 3 Aug 2000 20:22:50
Message: <398A0D84.245410EE@mailbag.com>
pk wrote:

> In most programming languages, they assign a value to TRUE, and another
> to FALSE(in the case above, FALSE=0, and TRUE=NOT(FALSE) )
> In other languages, fe, C(for which i dont't really remember the
> standard), it's something like TRUE = -1 (binary 11111111) and FALSE
> would be 0(binary 00000000)...

And then there are the Unix shells...

$ true
$ echo $?
0
$ false
$ echo $?
1

Just to keep everyone confused. ;-)

-Mark Gordon


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.