POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? : Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? Server Time
2 Sep 2024 00:18:44 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions?  
From: pk
Date: 31 Jul 2000 14:58:30
Message: <3985CCA9.1452D454@videotron.ca>
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> 
> In article <3985C626.46C5B6E8@videotron.ca> , pk <thi### [at] videotronca>
> wrote:
> 
> > Could somebody explain why the patch uses "^" for something else than
> > exponents??
> 
> As far as I know it does not use it for anything else...
Then, why did warp say "^"(that's an inverted V, right?) does the
opposite of &?

Paul
--
AKA paul_virak_khuong at yahoo.com, pkhuong at deja.com, pkhuong at
crosswinds.net and pkhuong at technologist.com(list not complete)...


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.