|
|
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>
> In article <39857905@news.povray.org> , Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason for the operator & having higher precedence than + or - in
> > isosurface functions?
>
> This looks like a bug to me, it should have lower precedence.
is "&" supposed to be the AND logical operator??It seems so,and if it
is, then it's normal: boolean operator have higher precedence than
arithmetical ones in almost all languages(and Maths); if not, then it's
a bug...
Could somebody explain why the patch uses "^" for something else than
exponents??
HTH,
Paul
--
AKA paul_virak_khuong at yahoo.com, pkhuong at deja.com, pkhuong at
crosswinds.net and pkhuong at technologist.com(list not complete)...
Post a reply to this message
|
|