so after all of this have you tested isosurface interaction with other
shapes yet?  how about replacing your plane with a huge cube?  i'd be
interested in your results; especially if you ever get the jaggies to go
away.  keep us posted.

Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
> news:39833716@news.povray.org...
> |   You should always specify the smallest 'contained_by' object possible
> | (which of course contains the volume you want to see from the isosurface).
> 
> Oh good gosh!  I had it approx. 1.6 units higher than needed to be!  Making
> it about 5 times higher in the y than the tallest mountains.
> Dumb mistake.  I think when I was adjusting to get correct mountain tops it
> was something else causing faulty peaks so I had the upper limit to the
> container way up.
> Sure glad you said that.
> 
> Bob

Post a reply to this message