ingo wrote:
> 
> 
> Wheee, cool.
> One remark, compare image one and three. Look for the highest mountain
> peak on the right. Despite the erosion, they seem to have the same
> absolute height.
> 

Sure it has, because i rescale to fit range after the calculation :-) (makes it
easier to program because you don't have to think about range checks).

I will probably also try it without rescaling soon...

BTW, i also tried it with higher resolution HFs and it often gets very grainy. 
Changing the water/erosion amount helps a bit, but it's still a problem.  

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message