|
|
Dick Balaska wrote:
> "Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> > Given John's restatement of the MPEG requirements, I suppose there is a little
> > more weight to the idea that the video player incapable of unusual frame sizes
> > is the bleeding edge.
>
> I noticed that since you've discovered "other" mpeg players, your latest vid
> is ~354x242 :)
? I've been using the same $89 program for COMPILING of MPEG's for almost a year
now, MainActor. I'll look and see if I've changed the format, but I doubt it. I am
stuck with basic freeware in the "place" at which I do some of my VIEWING of MPEG's,
and suspected that I wasn't alone. Anyway, I'm able to see my "354 x 242" at the
place with the default Windows software.
The discussion that followed went over my head. Was I half right, in that MPEG-2's are
being used but with "MPEG-1-compatible" switches, or what?
Post a reply to this message
|
|