|
|
What I meant is that you can see 'jagged' lines of the sphere as though
there are three or four semi transparent which are a bit larger than the
actual one.
I am sorry to contradict you, but the sphere is not as smooth as it can
be.
Maybe it is onely the JPEG artifacts.
> > Nice one.
> > One comment : You should play with the confidence and variance
> value for
> > the focal_blur . ( Confidence with something like 0.999999 and
> variance
> > with 1/1000000). It is going to take longer to render but the
> sphere in
> > the background will look better.
> >
> The sphere is in the very near foreground (can you see shadows of
> here [is 'sphere' female in english too ??? in german it is ...]
> on the plane???) and I did use very high confidence/variance
> values. As you can see there is no "dithering-like"-pattern in
> the sphere... the sphere is completely soft, as it should be ...
> But, of course I used a camera-aperature of 3.0 ... the highest
> value, moray allowed me to set directly..
>
> --
>
> ,', Jan Walzer \V/ http://wa.lzer.net ,',
> ',',' student of >|< mailto:jan### [at] lzernet ',','
> ' ComputerScience /A\ +49-177-7403863 '
Post a reply to this message
|
|