Bob Hughes wrote:

> Hi everyone.  Someone (or 2) had brought up the subject of "fire" once again,
> so...
> Here's two renders, first done with radiosity and second without (and a few
> minor changes made).  The radiosity has promise but it sure changes everything
> so I can't really judge by a non-radiosity rendering test.  All takes time as
> you all know.  Anyway, 2h18m for radiosity, 1h33m without.  Two area lights
> used and function 'func_9' for the isosurfaced logs, a turbulent gradient y
> media for the fire itself.
> Is it any good at all, is the question.  What do you think?  Never mind the
> compression artifacts and general scene please  ;-)

I don't know anything about radiosity or media, but I know that logs burn
better if they are stacked vertically and when there are several of them.

Nice flames. The ones in the bottom image looks best.


Tor Olav
--
mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html

Post a reply to this message