"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3947FC3E.C6B934B9@gmx.de...
> Ok, the lens flare itself is not bad, it's just that something seems
> missing.

Dad suggested that the lens flare is a little inaccurate, and I agree with
his reasons.  He says that at an angle like that, the rings wouldn't be
visible.  So, I'll try finding a setting without them.

> I looked at it again and recognized it (on the first look it seemed like
> clouds on the sky and some structure on the mountain).  I thought of
> really thick white smoke in the rough shape of a cone.

Yeah, I agree.  Also, I did a little research, and it seems the smoke really
only appears in the upper atmosphere, so I'm just going to use the SmokeGen
plugin for some really sweeeet looking clouds in a later revision.

--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-

Please visit my site at http://www.spectere.com! :-)

Post a reply to this message