"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> 
> If one continues to get interesting structures at many levels of
> magnification, this meets one most basic definition of a fractal.

Hmmm ... 

I believe the image itself is by your definition
a strange form for fractal.

But I think that this cannot be said to be 
an image OF a fractal, because the fractal 
patterns appear because of the limitations 
in the presentation of the striped sphere.


> Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
> 
> > I think this an interesting effect.
> >
> > Almost fractal isn't it ?


Tor Olav
--
mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html

Post a reply to this message