POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : 2nd image (work in progress) - temple1.jpg (0/1) : Re: 2nd image (work in progress) - temple1.jpg (1/1) Server Time
2 Oct 2024 06:27:58 EDT (-0400)
  Re: 2nd image (work in progress) - temple1.jpg (1/1)  
From: Bob Hughes
Date: 1 Jun 2000 02:06:46
Message: <3935fd76@news.povray.org>
To answer the other question, no, I don't call Moray or any other modeler a
cheat when POV-Ray is ultimately the ray tracer.  I do call it a skill I lack
a lot of, me being primarily and almost exclusively a pov file script writer
:-)

"Dave Rich" <est### [at] jetcablecom> wrote in message
news:dbqbjsstscno6ji74910iblq5ug2crr7sf@4ax.com...
| What are good settings to use for Focal Blur?
|
| Right now, i am using:
|
| camera

|   location  <     44.300,      93.000,       5.000>
|   sky       <    0.00000,     0.00000,     1.00000>
|   up        <        0.0,         0.0,         1.0>
|   right     <    1.81060,         0.0,         0.0>
|   angle         43.61300    // Vertical      24.922
|   look_at   <    -10.900,       5.100,       8.400>
|   focal_point  <-10.900, 5.100, 8.400>
|   aperture     1.0
|   blur_samples 100
|   confidence   0.999
|   variance     0.0001
| }
|

Those are high quality settings there, I often use much less than the best in
order to reduce render times.  I'm talking about the variance most because the
aperture is the amount of blurring which is scene dependant.  I'd say aperture
0.5 goes well for most typical scenes 1.0 and above become more like
telescope/binocular/microscope focuses.  But it's subjective to the artist.
You might see others here have differing opinions/advice.
The samples is 2nd most important I'd say, next to aperture.  And since all
this is so CPU clock-speed dependant as well then I'd suggest using a number
half your CPU MHz and go from there (likewise in variance as in 1/250 for a
500MHz).  Btw, confidence doesn't appear to be as notable of change in quality
and speed I think.  A value of 1.0 would do fine for the most part since the
default of 0.9 makes little difference.
Again, I think others might have other observations.

Bob


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.