Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote
> In article <392b8bf2@news.povray.org> , Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg>  wrote:
>
> >   In my opinion, if this is so, it's very wrong. 'ln' has always been
> > logarithm base e.
>

I was mistaken. I have been believing that the standard C language log was
log_10 when it's actually log_e. I have also known that it was log_e, since
I have had to use it correctly many times, but I have to relearn this fact
every
time

Post a reply to this message