And now it becomes ...

Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> I switch it around on rare occasions and do as you said here.
> 
> "Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandluf9couk> wrote in message
news:391bc0f6$1@news.povray.org...
> | I chop and change. Short replies I generally put the quote at the end.
> | Longer replies I quote at the beginning. I'm certainly not consistent or
> | particularily logical about it. Is there a standard netiquette?
> |

> | news:391AB3E8.4A62A49A@dod.no...
> | >
> | > Btw, why don't you quote below original text?
> 
> However, for the most part I usually let the quote go afterward of anything
> I say unless it seems I need to splice into the previous message someplace
> in the middle.
> I just like seeing the next reply first because I tend to read almost everything
> and so then I tend to recognize the quoted part anyway.
> Although this isn't going to work out as well for forgotten posts I can still just
> reread whatever was quoted after getting the idea of the follow-up.
> Of course it must be such a personal preference I can't see anyone adhering
> to a certain "netiquette" rule regarding this, which I think I've seen remarked
> by others before too.

even more silly!

-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
  +47 90 62 71 78          DoD#2101, DoDRT#017, NIC#015, PJ#006, OGM#007
  azo### [at] dodno, Ducati M600              Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.

Post a reply to this message