Another reason I used (.125/6) for the second cone radius is that the macro
is shrinking at the same rate (scale .6). Although looking back at the code
I see I forgot to update the macro's scale. It is at scale .65.

Ken wrote:

> Warp wrote:
> >
> > Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> > : That is ridiculous.
> >
> >   Why?
>
> Maybe you are some sort of mathematical genius but for me I have
> absolutely no capacity for doing math functions in my head.
>
> Take for example 2/1.2978
>
> Can you do that without paper or a calculator ?
>
> Maybe you can but I would rather have a real number to look at than
> have to work out the equation. Especially if it's been a while since
> I have worked on the scene.
>
> --
> Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

--
Samuel Benge

E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom

Visit my isosurface tutorial at http://members.aol.com/stbenge

Post a reply to this message