Your right on the dot, Warp. It's also to change the code faster if I want the
cones to shrink at a higher rate.

Warp wrote:

> Tony Micklus <ton### [at] j4tbcom> wrote:
> : 1..Your cone statement has a radius of (.125*.6) why are the numbers
> : seperated why not make the radius .075?
>
>   I think it's just easier to understand for him (and for anyone trying to
> read the code) that way.
>   For example, if I have something that's usually 2.5 units long, and then
> I want that same thing half that long, it's easier to read if I write
> "2.5*0.5" (or "2.5/2") instead of "1.25".

--
Samuel Benge

E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom

Visit my isosurface tutorial at http://members.aol.com/stbenge

Post a reply to this message