"TonyB" wrote:
> Well, here's the latest installment of my logo.

Version 4 that is. Please keep numbering the versions clearly. That makes it
easier for people to say what they think is better and worse compared to
other versions... :-)

> The fine-tunings included returning to the previous pupil

That is good I think.

> centering it in the eye, and making it a little bigger

I have compared this version and version 2 closely and I think you should
move the pupil up again and make it smaller like it was in version 2. The
centering doesn't look nice.

> including making the end a little smaller

The thin end of the edge is slightly thinner in this version.
It makes the logo unbalanced I think.
I think it was better in version 2.

> making the yellow stand out more in the gradient

I think it is too bright. It makes the logo unbalanced.
Try something in between this version and version 2.

> and making it end just a few degrees sooner.

I don't mind that.

> Oh, I also changed the highlights a smidgen (not really noticeable)

The phong highlight is tighter in this version.
I liked it better in version 2. But now I'm nit-picking!

Also:

The eye is slightly wider (or more closed) in this version. I think that is
good.

And now something general:

You made several different versions this time. 2 different black and white
versions, a 2D color version and a 3D color version. I think that is good.
We could say that the only thing that has to be the same in all the versions
is the outline. That way we could make versions with different colors too.
One version could have the colored gradient, while another could have 2
colors only, like in version 1. What do you think of this?

Greetings,

Rune

---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!

Post a reply to this message