"TonyB" wrote:
> As per someone's suggestion, I'll answer
> everyone in one message.
>
> I can see that most of you aren't happy
> with the change. No problem, I was just
> testing another angle, we can always go
> back and take another direction.
> But which?

From version 1 to version 2 you changed the shape of the edge so it looks
more like an eye. That is good I think!

From version 2 to version 3 you changed the pupil. That was not good I
think. You should change it back to being a simple sphere. That seems to be
what others say too.

Since version 1 you have also changed the colors. You have used a form of
red-green gradient for the edge. I personally preferred the plain colors
like in logo 1. Not so much the particular colors you used, but the fact
that you didn't use a gradient, and that the edge and pupil were two
different, yet close colors. I think it looked more stylistic and less
see-how-colorful-I-can-make-it-like.

However, it seems that many others prefer the gradient.

> "Simon Kvaal" wrote:
> > I might be picky, but it seems that
> > you've swept an ellipsoid, and that
> > on the thick end of the sweep, the
> > ellipsoid is somewhat "skewed".
> > Maybe it's okay, but was it supposed
> > to be this way? (I'm not saying
> > anything else looks better!)
>
> Yes, well, I rotated in z by 35 degrees,
> then scaled it, so it should skew.

I think you should keep it that way. It's more like an eye-brow this way,
than if the edge ended in a perfect half circle. Not that anybody said that
you should change it, it was just a comment.

By the way, I don't think the black and white version should have those
white highlights. I liked your own version better.

Greetings,

Rune

---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!

Post a reply to this message