Warp wrote:
>
> In general photons act a bit ilogically with shadowless object. When you
> make an object shadowless and the light passes through that object, it's
> logical to expect photons to pass through as well. I don't know why the
> shadowless-keyword is ignored by the photons calculations.
Yes, well I don't know either why there's a seperate keyword for photons and
regular lights. More flexibility I guess. What I'm saying is that
pass_through could have been enabeled by default for looks_like objects,
just as shadowless is.
sig
Post a reply to this message
|