Johannes Hubert wrote:
> 
> "Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
> news:39113B37.5F48511C@pacbell.net...
> 
> > There are quit a few rules to read through
> > for the competition and it would be understandable is some people
> > just don't read English well enough to understand them all. In this
> > particular situation the person who submitted that image was using
> > English poorly in his description which might explain it.
> 
> You might have a point here.
> 
> But I think there still should be some process to eliminate images that
> violate the rules. If the organizers don't have the time (which I could
> understand), then there should be a mechnism for that for the voters (as
> Warp says):
> 
> If a certain number of voters declares an image as violating the rules,
> the panel should have a look at it (maybe contact the artist) and decide
> if it needs to be pulled.
> Does something like that exist? Are the voters aware that they should
> look out for rules violations?

Two rounds back one entry was pulled because it was prior art that
had been determined to have been created prior to the start of the
round it was submitted to and had been on a website for some time.
I do not know if there is a dedicated effort on the part of the
IRTC admin to screen the submissions but it appears they are willing
to do something about violations once reported to them.

-- 
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message