Thomas Willhalm wrote:

> Mmmh, I don't like the idea of saving a temporary file that has several
> times the size of the final image. Perhaps you should consider to apply
> the filter on the fly. I know that you need more than one pixel a time for
> several of the exististing and proposed filters. Perhaps it is possible
> to determine which one you need and forget the others.
>

What about the possibility of aborting/continuing a trace ? It's already a
problem with the current post-processing implementation (focal blur behaves
strangely when a trace that have been aborted is resumed).

G.

Post a reply to this message