Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote...
>   I think that this patch is not of very much use if we can't get the
> transformations from an object. You seldom define the transformations of
> an object separately.

But if you really cared about the transformations and needed to use them
(and/or their inverse) somewhere, it would be very easy to declare the
transformations separately.  This feature, though useful, is not necessary
for the functionality of Chris' patch.

-Nathan

Post a reply to this message