>A complementary suggestion : let's not decide for a logo just
>after the vote, but start a discussion about the ones that were
>clearly deemed "best".  None of the logos seems mature enough,
>and they need some more improvement (individual or collective
>improvement).


I concur. I think that if there are several good ones, say for example, the
top 3 or 5, they be discussed and go "back to the drawingboard" for another
round. As of this post, the winner is #6, with 6 votes; close behind is #11,
with 5 votes; then #4 and #5, with 3 votes; #3, with 2 votes; and #12, with
1 vote.

Post a reply to this message