"Greg M. Johnson" <"gregj;-)56590\""@aol.c;-)om> wrote :
>
> Here's my first stab at a procedurally derived tree.  Further
> experimentation underway.  Feel free to take this and improve it.
>

    Again, not too shabby. But I think that starting from this it will be
hard to improve it much. I would rather see something that is more like the
lparser system that can start from a basic trunk and then divides into
branches and twigs. Then you could use trace or something to put leaves on
it...

    I am really interested in this and am pounding away at it. But I have
little hope of accomplishing it. I can't get a division, not even a simple
Y... once I get that the rest should just be tedium.

Post a reply to this message