Thanks, but maybe more trouble than it's worth.  I've had to try and explain
here at home to people that I didn't make it to begin with.  Maybe that's a good
sign.

Bob

"David Wilkinson" <dav### [at] cableinetcouk> wrote in message
news:ppltcs0sroq96nv4jlqoveq5ces2vnafvd@4ax.com...
| On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:14:05 -0600, "Bob Hughes"
| <omn### [at] hotmailcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote:
|
| >"Rick [Kitty5]" <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> wrote in message
| >news:38ce5727$1@news.povray.org...
| >| how about posting a different view point, so we can see all your hard
| >| construction work! - (not that we want to know how it was done or
anything!)
| >
| >Okay.  Interesting, isn't it?  Hope this small rendering shows it okay.
| >My hard work would only be that this illusion can be rendered in one go,
rather
| >than the two it took before which was what Sascha Ledinsky had to do in order
to
| >get the illusion to work.  I've also now heard that this unfinished work was
| >never completed, sadly enough.  If you read the  waterfa1.txt  at the URL I
put
| >into my other message here an explanation is given as to how it was
previously
| >done.
| >There isn't really much visible sign of the difference between the before and
| >after modification renders except for aesthetic change (and less than perfect
| >fix).
| >Sascha had done the tough part already.
| >
| >Bob
| >
| Nice work Bob
| ----------------------------
| dav### [at] cableinetcouk
| http://members.vavo.com/squiffy/
| http://www.hamiltonite.mcmail.com
| ----------------------------

Post a reply to this message