It's alright but it's just that the encompassing circle seems to detract from
the smaller one, which is for the letter "o" I would guess.
Maybe a box (square rather) would be less confusing, and plaque-like (plus throw
another primitive into the emblem?).  I was thinking if the large circle were
solid and the other "letter parts" were embossed or raised on that then it could
be better.  That's where my thinking leads to anyhow.

Bob

"Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> wrote in message
news:38b024ff@news.povray.org...
| "Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> wrote:
| > I really like Justin Whitton's POV-Ray logo.
| > If POV-Ray should have an official logo I
| > think that should be it.
| >
| > Do you think this should be the official
| > POV-Ray logo? I mean not necessarily these
| > versions, but the basic design Justin Whitton
| > came up with?
|
| It's important for all logos that they are
| simple, so that they can be presented in many
| different ways.
|
| The image attached here shows the same logo,
| only presented in a simpler way.
|
| What I'm asking you is if you like the logo,
| not if you like the way it's presented.
|
| (just to avoid confusion)
|
| Greetings,
|
| Rune
|
| ---
| Updated January 24: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
| Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
| The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
| miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
|
|
|
|

Post a reply to this message