Personally I don't like it much but I also have to admit that it has many of
the qualities of a good logo (BTW, I have been known not to like many good
and popular things...) It is clear, balanced and simple while having a kind
of obscurity that means that those in the know will get more out of it.

Because of the simplicity it can be put on a variety of objects without
interfering with the look of the object. If it or something like it becomes
accepted generally, it could help to improve the knowledge and use of
POV-Ray by using it to 'brand' images before distribution.  Not a bad idea
in general, for those interested...


"Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> wrote in message
news:38af21d2@news.povray.org...
> I really like Justin Whitton's POV-Ray logo.
> If POV-Ray should have an official logo I think that should be it.
>
> Attached are two versions of the logo that I've made. I've changed the
> tangents so that they only just touches the little circle. In the original
> version they intersected a little.
>
> Do you think this should be the official POV-Ray logo? I mean not
> necessarily these versions, but the basic design Justin Whitton came up
> with?
>
> Greetings,
>
> Rune
>
> ---
> Updated January 24: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
> Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
> The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
> miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message