Greg M. Johnson wrote:
> 
> Sigmund Kyrre Aas wrote:
> 
> > You don't compensate for aspect ratio:
> >
> > > box{<0,0,0>,<1,1,0.001>
> 
> As I said, none of the following first lines give a sensible solution:
> 
> box{<0,0,0>,<1,            1,              0.001>
> box{<0,0,0>,<1,            689/126,   0.001>
> box{<0,0,0>,<126/689, 1,              0.001>
	The important change he made is this:
scale 14 *vnormalize(<126,689,1>) instead of scale 14
	(it's lost in the middle of the original message, which is
why you probably overlooked it...)

		Jerome
-- 

* Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* to Hyde...                  * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*******************************

Post a reply to this message