|
|
I love the look. I m going to give it a try.
"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
>
> I've seen some tree makers here which are breathtaking in their visual
> beauty. I think that the coolest alorgithm for a tree, however, would
> be procedural and not involve lots of translate & rotate statements.
>
> Here's my first stab at a procedurally derived tree. Further
> experimentation underway. Feel free to take this and improve it.
>
> #declare rag=function{ 1/(x^2+y^2+z^2)^0.5*5} // 35;
> #macro Treegent(gent,tx,ty,tz)
> //gent is currently useless randomizer, translate to tx, ty, tz
> union{
> isosurface{
> function{
> noise3d((x+gent)/rag,(y+gent)/rag,(z+gent)/rag)&(-y-1) }
> accuracy .001
> threshold .01
> contained_by {sphere{0,15} }
> bounded_by {sphere{0,2 } }
> }
> isosurface{
> function{ noise3d((x+gent)/rag,(y+gent)/20/rag,(z+gent)/rag)}
> accuracy .001
> threshold .08
> contained_by { sphere{0,5} }
> bounded_by { sphere{0,1} }
> }
> pigment{
> spherical
> pigment_map{
> [0 Green]
> [.2 Brown]
> [1 Brown]
> }
> scale 12
> }
> finish{ambient 0.1}
> translate <tx,ty,tz>
> }
> #end
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
--
Mr. Art
"Often the appearance of reality is more important
than the reality of the appearance."
Bill DeWitt 2000
Post a reply to this message
|
|