Paul Jones wrote:
>
> Fantastic... but are you going to account for the over-under aspect that is
> traditionally associated with knotwork?
>
You are right. The algorithm takes care of that (just follow one line
and change the kind of crossing. It should work out.) but I implemented
the plain
version first. This way I can still improve it. :-)
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|