Thomas Willhalm wrote:

> I was aware of this article, but it is more than one year old. Furthermore,
> it contains the sentence:
> 
> "We hope to be able to do some of that work [on POV-Ray 4.0] in parallel
> with our work on 3.5 but that may be wishful thinking."
> 
> That's why I asked about the current state of POV-Ray 4.0. From your
> comment I conclude that Chris' wish hasn't been fulfilled.

Let's suffice it to say that the POV-Team is not willing to discuss
specific plans for POV-Ray v4.0 at this time and leave it at that.

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message