I never claimed to understand the code.  I'm just providing the 'fixed'
source so that everybody else can compile it and use it. If a 'hack' works,
that's usually good enough for most people who just want it to work.  When
somebody writes a "proper" fix for a bug, it will probably get incorporated
into the next version anyway so the 'problem' goes away!

Stu.

"Nieminen Juha" <war### [at] punarastascstutfi> wrote in message
news:38993b51@news.povray.org...
>   I think he said: "This is an inelegant way to go about it, but arf".
>
>   Shouldn't the povray code be elegant, well made, high-quality,
> easy-to-understand, portable, modular and in any sense almost perfect?
> Is it good to content to solutions that are more a 'hack' than a real
> fix?
>   This is not a flame, just asking... :)
>
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message