Well for one thing if 'jitter' is used anywhere (arealights, antialiasing) then
any animation is likely to suffer the dance of the pixels effect.
I seldom use a real fine AA for animations simply because they tend to have
enough motion that the smoothness isn't as noticeable anyway.  Making it a
faster total render time.  However lack of any AA whatsoever isn't going to stop
pixel jumping unless there are no patterns or at least none with small scale
variations.  And using some AA should help prevent the "jaggies' from jumping
somewhat too.
Pretty much the way you would think it would be.

Bob

"cadman" <NOS### [at] graffitinet> wrote in message
news:38922517@news.povray.org...
| Thanks.  Will the aa make the animation funny?  I will do radiosity

| knob--I'll fix that.
|
|
| cadman <NOS### [at] graffitinet> wrote in message
| news:3890fae1@news.povray.org...
| > Thanks for all your suggestions on Part I.  For you who have been
| following
| > the story, here's what I did this time:
| >
| > rgbft <0.8, 0.85, 0.8, 0.75, 0.15>
| >
| > I just fiddled with f and t until it looked okay.  The bathroom light
| > (fluorescent) used a higher t value (something like 0.25).  no_shadow
| looked
| > too unreal, and I didn't want to jack with media since the final product
| > will be an animation (walk-thru).  What do you think?  BTW, I'm kinda
| proud
| > of the carpet texture.
| >
| >
| >
|
|

Post a reply to this message