Looks clean and clear to me.

cadman wrote:
> 
> Thanks for all your suggestions on Part I.  For you who have been following
> the story, here's what I did this time:
> 
> rgbft <0.8, 0.85, 0.8, 0.75, 0.15>
> 
> I just fiddled with f and t until it looked okay.  The bathroom light
> (fluorescent) used a higher t value (something like 0.25).  no_shadow looked
> too unreal, and I didn't want to jack with media since the final product
> will be an animation (walk-thru).  What do you think?  BTW, I'm kinda proud
> of the carpet texture.
> 
>  [Image]

-- 
Mr. Art

"Often the appearance of reality is more important 
than the reality of the appearance."
Bill DeWitt 2000

Post a reply to this message