Nieminen Juha wrote:
>   I think that there should be a way to scale the pattern itself, 
> independently of the normals.  Does this make any sense?

Sure it makes perfect senese. But isn't that what the new 
"no_bump_scale" keyword already does? I figured Nathan added
it because of the controversy over the new normal behaviour
so you could retain the ability to do a "pattern only"
transformation if you wanted.

Charles

Post a reply to this message