> Since art move beyond frames (20th century) this is not very common any
> more. Notice how many modern paintings have no frame, or at most an
> insignificant one, while some 17th century masterpieces are more frame
> then painting. Either way it's an artistic choice with a functionality.
> Makes you wonder about a monitor as frame.

IMHO I don't like all that old religious art. It always shows people and
everything is flat, kind of drab I think. (How many Madonna with Child
paintings can there be anyway?)
gack...sputter...my modem is dying on me again...

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>

Post a reply to this message