>No, I don't mean that (see post from yesterday), and I don't quite see
>the urge for such a feature. Wouldn't this do the trick?:
>isosurface {
>   function {}
>   rotate y*45
>}

Not if you plan to compose it with another function.  What we need is to
let vrotate() be allowable in isosurface functions, but that'd require us
to allow vectors.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html

Post a reply to this message