Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
>   I've tried and tried to get these "dust clouds" to look okay and
> still end up
> with them not passing inspection.  Going from originally 320x240 res.
> to this
> larger size didn't help the looks any.  Well as you will see it looks
> more like
> a very thickened atmosphere rather than a very thin one, or so I'd say
> anyhow.
> Then there's the blobs just not fitting in right, and the media
> patterns keep me
> one step behind too.
>   Sorry, I shouldn't bother anyone with my dissatisfaction.  I'll
> leave that up
> to you... figured I could at least show what else I've been doing.
> 
> Bob
> --
>        omniVerse: "Not all really, and not all good at that."
>  http://users.aol.com/inversez/  (Home)
> http://users.aol.com/xyzunknown/
> (Links)
>  http://users.aol.com/iotadot/  (Gallery)
> http://users.aol.com/persistenceofv/
> (Anims)
> 
>  [Image]

I think you should see this as an animation and I think you should judge
it from an animation. In a still it may look all wrong while animated it
may blow you off your socks (it being a storm...).
I can see some things wrong in this pic but I don't know how it compares
to the ones in your clips.

Remco

Post a reply to this message