Bob,
The down side of using the three image side-by-side presentation is that
you have to limit the size of the images, so you lose the slight advantage
of cross-eye. On my 17inch monitor, at 1024x768, the left and right
parts of the StarChild image are each 4.75 inches (10.23cm). To present
them parallel I'd need to reduce them to only 53% this size.
So it eats up bandwidth, I'll post a smaller parallel, and larger cross-eyed
next time.

Harold

omniVERSE <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:388038ba@news.povray.org...
> Hey thanks, that would be of great help for all I think.  I might try that
> suggestion myself about using 3 images for doing it both ways.
> Still, I'm perplexed at the concept of crossing the eyes because it is so
much
> farther to move them, like you say for bigger pictures.  That's what I
just
> don't get.  You'd have to angle your eyes so far that way (crossing and
holding
> in place is key I gather).  I'm not saying that parallel is any good for
large
> stereopairs though, no, I agree.
>
> Bob
>

Post a reply to this message