Funny I'm the exact opposite. I can see the cross-eyed ones just fine, and
I've never been able to get the parallel ones to work. I just can't get my
eyes do do it, while I can cross 'em real easily ...

--
Paul Vanukoff
van### [at] primenetcom

"omniVERSE" <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:388038ba@news.povray.org...
> Hey thanks, that would be of great help for all I think.  I might try that
> suggestion myself about using 3 images for doing it both ways.
> Still, I'm perplexed at the concept of crossing the eyes because it is so
much
> farther to move them, like you say for bigger pictures.  That's what I
just
> don't get.  You'd have to angle your eyes so far that way (crossing and
holding
> in place is key I gather).  I'm not saying that parallel is any good for
large
> stereopairs though, no, I agree.
>
> Bob
>
> "3Dude" <bai### [at] jpsnet> wrote in message news:3880358a@news.povray.org...
> > Yes, cross-eye is easy for some, not even possible for many. The
> > advantage, for those that can cross the eyes, is that the images
> > can be any size, whereas, except for a few very rare individuals,
> > people can't view parallel pairs if the images are wider than 2.5
> > inches, as displayed on their monitors.
> >
> > Next time I'll post in both cross and parallel. :-)
> >
> > Harold
> >
> > omniVERSE <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
> > news:38803075@news.povray.org...
> > > The more cross-eyed stereo pairs I see the more confused I am as to
why it
> > would
> > > be better or easier to see.  Doesn't anyone realize how much you have
to
> > angle
> > > each eye direction to see the center of a left or right picture?  I
just
> > can't
> > > focus while doing so even though I can get my eyes crossed that much.
The
> > > diverged-eye way at least starts you off with the images on the same
side
> > of
> > > your face  X-]
> > > Sorry to carry on so about it, but since there's no way to see them as
is
> > I have
> > > to shift them around in PSP (so I wanted to whine about it).  Anyway,
it
> > is
> > > definately a great 3D effect and good subject matter as well.  That
reach
> > for
> > > the world isn't nearly as good in 2D.
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message