"Remco de Korte" <rem### [at] xs4allnl> wrote :
>
> I don't mean to be rude but 681Kb seems a bit much for an image.
> I think it is very impolite to do so and even more so since you're
> obviously don't want us to even know your name.

    I sort of agree with this. If it were a special technique that required
such a large post, or maybe something as "awesome" as claimed, maybe... but
for what seems to be several views of a mostly black, simple reiterative ...
um.... thing... I really feel some compression was called for. I reduced it
to 155K without any decrease in visible quality.

    I got all the images in one download and I almost thought I had gotten
locked up and was ready to re-connect... then I found out it was different
views of the same thing!

Post a reply to this message