Adam Coffman  wrote >
[ ... ]
> So I also tried the (old-fashioned?) poly{7, <...>} on this, and it
> worked pretty well.
>
> ... and as long as I'm noticing exponents, my version of the POV 3.1
> docs (for poly) listed x^5z and x^5 where it seems x^6z and x^6 should
> be.  This persists in david sharp's (extremely useful) "poly objects
> templates" code in the text.tutorials thread starting 5/23/99.

Yes, I noticed this probably about the same time as you when
attempting the same thing.

Post a reply to this message