"Jon A. Cruz" wrote:
> 
> Ken wrote:
> 
> > "Jon A. Cruz" wrote:
> >
> > > correctly, but any Microsoft reading software is broken and in direct
> > > violation of the RFC's,
> >
> > What does RFC stand for ?
> >
> 
> Well, since I understand Ken is not a programmer, I'll take it as an honest
> question. (If it were coming from a programmer, especially one doing any
> net programming at all, that question should have required an extremely
> flame-on slam... but that's another story.)

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. In my business the holy grail of
specifications is the US Mil Specs. Barring available Mil Specs for a
job we design by customer specifications or through I.E.E.E. specification.
I then percieve the RFC to be basicaly a general consensus among those
in the know about how basic internet protocols are to be handled in the
absence of an "official" decree on the matter.

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message