No, web page was dated 1998 and it was color, I almost put the two URLs here
yesterday but decided it probably wasn't important.
The other monitors, the 23" and 34", that web page was also dated 1998 I'm
pretty sure.
Oh, had them in the history:
http://www.nashville.net/%7Egriffin/monitors/PDS00.html
and http://www.m-media.com/sampo-sm.html
Apparently more consistent with the television sort of monitor but for PCs.

Bob

"Chris Huff" <chr### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:chrishuff_99-19B060.06284907012000@news.povray.org...
> In article <387591eb@news.povray.org>, "omniVERSE" <inv### [at] aolcom>
> wrote:
>
> > I searched the 'net a little for large monitors for the fun of it since
> > it
> > got brought up (by me I think).
> > Oddly enough the two places I found said maximum resolutions were
> > 1024x768
> > on a 34" and 512x342 on a 23" Mac one.  Could it be that resolution
> > remains
> > low on those big ones or I just happened upon a couple oddball webpages?
>
>
> 512*342? I think you found a couple monitors that could be classified as
> antique. Was it monochrome?
> I don't know what the typical resolutions for the newer large monitors
> are, though.
>
> --
> Chris Huff
> e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
> Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/

Post a reply to this message