Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote ...
>
> 1.) A
> 2.) B
> 3.) B
> 4.) B
> 5.) B
> 6.) B
>

I understand your rationale but I wonder why you chose A for 1 and B for 2
and 3.  To be consistent, I would think that if 2 and 3 were B, then 1
should be B also.

-Nathan

Post a reply to this message