Ron Parker wrote:
> 
> Did the IRTC become the Internet Rendering Tools Competition while I
> slept last night?  If not, how did this win?
> 
> >RENDERER USED:
> >    3D Studio Max default renderer
> 
> And what about this?
> 
> >the sun was softened by a fadin Lens Effect Flare
> >rendered in Video post.
> 
> Can we have a clarification on the question of whether
> postprocessing being "built in" to your renderer makes it legal?
> Should I start working on that Photoshop plugin patch for POV-Ray now?
> 
> And please note that this is not sour grapes.  I didn't enter the
> competition this round.  I'm just disappointed to see a bunch of
> imagemaps rendered with a scanline renderer in seven minutes win this
> round when there were so many more deserving entries.

	If you don't mind my saying, I have been thinking of testing the
envelop or pushing the loophole to see what happens. I can make
PS sit up and beg and I have been thinking of exactly that. Do as
much as possible in PS and then run a two minute render and see
how it fares. 

	My original interest in POV was to do things that are hard in PS
and got addicted. No more struggling with textures just crank
them out. This time (six foot cockroach) I got a compliment on
the wallpaper and I stated that it was created in PS. 

	Anyone else feel like testing the limits? As long as it crawls
through a renderer at some point it appears to be acceptable. And
then renderer appears to mean that the package uses the word
render in its sales brochure. 

-- 
http://www.giwersworld.org/artiii/

Oh my God! They've rendered Kenny!

How to profit from the end of civilization as know it available
here 
soon.

Post a reply to this message