The plot thickens...


"SamuelT." wrote:
> 
> I already use interpolate 2 for the image_maps I use for the isosurface. I
> posted a new shape a few minutes ago that has nearly no artifacts whatsoever.
> That is because I used triangle_wave for the pigment. Had I used scallop_wave,
> the bad effects would have been very noticeable.
> 
> Samuel Benge
> 
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> > If you notice that when using image_map pigments the 'interpolate' makes
> > a big difference. Seems 2 is best to me, not 4. The isosurface probably
> > uses a similar convention itself rather than straight procedural
> > pigment. If it did it would obviously have no noticeable artifacts, or
> > so I would think. Perhaps there is a resolution limitation then? Based
> > upon the 1 POV unit square a pigment is usually confined to?

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message